Three cutting-edge gaming monitors were unveiled at Computex, each pushing the boundaries of refresh rates. The standout is the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, a 1080p display boasting an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. In contrast, both MSI and Acer have introduced 1440p monitors with 500Hz refresh rates, which are challenging to drive even with top-tier hardware like an RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation technology.
Acer's Predator X27U F5 not only offers a high refresh rate but also features a QD-OLED panel for superior color accuracy. This model is initially launching in Europe and China, with a starting price of €899. Although Acer plans to bring it to the US market, specific pricing remains undisclosed due to ongoing tariff negotiations with retailers. Given the rising cost of technology in the US, affordability might be a concern.
Similarly, MSI's 27-inch MPG 271QR X50 also incorporates a QD-OLED panel but has yet to reveal its price. A unique aspect of this monitor is its AI-driven burn-in protection. Equipped with a small sensor at the bottom, the monitor detects when you step away and automatically turns off, utilizing a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to safeguard against pixel burn-in—a common issue with OLED displays, especially in gaming contexts where static images are prevalent. While the AI element might raise eyebrows, it's a step forward in proactive screen protection.
The introduction of monitors with such high refresh rates, like the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG, raises questions about their necessity. At 1080p and 610Hz, this display is exceptionally fast, even in an era where technologies like Nvidia's multi-frame generation can boost frame rates significantly. However, achieving these frame rates, even in games like Marvel Rivals, would require an RTX 5090 and possibly multi-frame generation, which introduces latency—a no-go for competitive gamers.
Moreover, to fully leverage such high refresh rates, a robust CPU is essential. CPUs must supply data quickly enough to keep the GPU running smoothly. While technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation help, achieving around 600 fps still demands a high-performance CPU.
The advantage of such high frame rates lies in the significantly reduced render latency, which is crucial in competitive gaming. For instance, players of Counter-Strike 2 opt for the lowest settings to maximize frame rates and minimize input lag, which can be decisive in competitive play. Yet, the question remains whether the likely high cost of these monitors will be justified for the average gamer.